A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving future neighbours around the development of a wall in a coastal internet site within a north Dublin suburb, a case which has attracted nationwide consideration subsequent an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed spouse and children property at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of planning breaches, environmental worries, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has evolved into a remarkably publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development functions at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, seek out to construct their family house. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, where by growth pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being made by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted less than scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment on a Exclusive Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such locations are issue to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably inside of a sensitive coastal setting such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach of their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partly crafted, is in the right position. Their legal staff has characterised the motion as an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their view, an allegation which has been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal organizing disputes, where sights of the sea are both very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic endeavours via the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the site, In accordance with sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been meant to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how The 2 Adult men entered the water all through significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Just about the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately from the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second while in the authorized timeline.
On the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just wanting to produce a family members household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one functions are already performed based on Skilled assistance and authorised ideas. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into the sea through a storm, never alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish René Collier and Paul Feely Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by waist-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in protection, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether the wall as built complies with preparing permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who must live together with each other long once the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles like environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin lately.