A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours over the construction of the wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental considerations, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Times write-up about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to construct their family members house. The situation has become emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven people. According to the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being constructed by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted beneath setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their planning authorization by developing a wall beyond the boundaries in their web site, resulting in an encroachment over a Special Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such spots are subject matter to stringent controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically in the sensitive coastal natural environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, that's partly created, is in the right place. Their legal staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation which has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal planning disputes, exactly where sights of the sea are both equally very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-higher water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps were cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC René Collier was getting encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were lined in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the authorized timeline.
With the core in the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging paperwork, maps, and conditions hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have explained their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple basically trying to make a family property in accordance with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Special Spot of Conservation and say that every one works have already been performed based on Skilled assistance and approved ideas. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean all through a storm, don't change the underlying facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about design of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as increasingly popular. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become more contentious.
The Irish Times article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been involved with nearby advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from really different Qualified backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waistline-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the end result remains uncertain. The courtroom should establish whether the wall as developed complies with planning permission and whether or not any encroachment right into a Particular Spot of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning conditions. Nonetheless the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to live together with each other lengthy once the authorized fees have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre of the dispute stands partly developed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. No matter whether it will in the end be altered, taken off, or completed as planned will depend on the court’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probable continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.