A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among prospective neighbours around the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes captivated countrywide consideration next an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Situations post about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, seek to build their family home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their arranging permission by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their internet site, resulting in an encroachment with a Distinctive Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as such regions are topic to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in a very delicate coastal surroundings for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, that's partially designed, is in the correct place. Their lawful crew has characterised the action being an try and delay or frustrate a lawful development. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their watch, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where views of the sea are equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary efforts via the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the site, In accordance with sworn proof referenced within the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-high drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances, an image which includes due to the fact become emblematic with the intensity from the dispute. These steps weren't basically symbolic; they were being meant to Acquire visual evidence in the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from your sea Irish Moments described, describing how the two Guys entered the h2o for the duration of critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm h2o to photograph the location grew to become The most putting descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that these kinds of steps ended up cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into a location affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered intimately with the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court read even more submissions on no matter if interim orders ought to be granted to halt design pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential instant in the legal timeline.
With the Main with the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain the wall, as built, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has long been called meticulous in his examination of planning documents, maps, and circumstances attached on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their motion is motivated by worry for environmental security and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving a private check out, insisting rather that it's about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've got described their extensive-standing link to the realm and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a few simply seeking to create a relatives house in accordance While using the regulation. Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times They deny which the wall encroaches with a Special Spot of Conservation and say that each one performs are already performed according to Experienced assistance and approved designs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, including moving into the sea throughout a storm, do not change the fundamental specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how preparing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute above design of wall at coastal website is becoming a shorthand description for just a circumstance that numerous observers see as ever more frequent. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation involving private land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Occasions posting about René Collier observed that the businessman had Formerly been linked to nearby advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, nevertheless not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from very different professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are getting to be synonymous With all the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from your sea Irish Situations protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waist-substantial drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of waistline-higher water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared repeatedly in protection, reflecting equally the physical truth of your coastline and also the symbolic nature of the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal method.
Given that the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays unsure. The courtroom must determine whether the wall as designed complies with scheduling permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and scheduling ailments. Still the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who ought to Are living together with each other lengthy once the legal expenses happen to be paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around building performs at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, but the implications of the case increase outside of that deal with. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition, it underscores how speedily a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when basic concerns like environmental defense and home legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a location of purely natural elegance and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre of the dispute stands partly crafted, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved legal questions. Regardless of whether it can eventually be altered, taken out, or completed as planned will rely upon the court’s conclusions. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will very likely keep on to look in headlines, linked indelibly to one of the most carefully viewed planning disputes in north Dublin lately.